New Images / Sig Rule [NOW REMOVED]

Admin

20-03-2005 21:10:17

I killed the stupid image resize hack. Everything should be back to normal now.

Sorry it was so crappy.

vulcan300

20-03-2005 21:13:49

thx for following up.

lates.

PoPoJiJo

20-03-2005 21:24:26

Thanks for taking care of the issue )

Godrockdj

20-03-2005 21:40:34

A good idea.

GBuntitled

20-03-2005 21:47:07

Someone resized the .gifurl==http://=http:///url image of the girl with the nice ass very nicely. Good job! lol

jadem

21-03-2005 09:42:09

[quote0962eb3821="GBuntitled"]Someone resized the .gifurl==http://=http:///url image of the girl with the nice ass very nicely. Good job! lol[/quote0962eb3821] roll

Thanks Admin. Some of those were getting a bit out of hand!

stavros

21-03-2005 09:48:34

I know most versions of phpBB has options to disable images, avatars and signatures for each user. I would love that option!

cdmanproductions

21-03-2005 13:25:25

it's messed my picture up, like stretched it out.

Admin

21-03-2005 15:20:36

You can specify dimensions in the image tag now. As long as those dimensions do not exceed the maximum, they will be used for your image. For example

[490160]http//tinyurl.com/5r6mv/blue8uk.jpg[" alt=""/imga2f94f8a4f]

The tag looks like [ img=" ] [ widthheight ]url[ " alt=""/img ]

Just remove the spaces.

EatChex89

21-03-2005 17:42:23

i dont like it.. now when i go to put smilies in (from outside sources), they get all huge..

hovigga

21-03-2005 19:24:02

you put smileys from out side sources?

EatChex89

21-03-2005 19:28:15

[quotecfa5561c06="hovigga"]you put smileys from out side sources?[/quotecfa5561c06]

yea. and now the stupid thing resizes it.... makes the forum less fun now.

wood

21-03-2005 20:26:54

[quote8b78cd6736="EatChex89"][quote8b78cd6736="hovigga"]you put smileys from out side sources?[/quote8b78cd6736]

yea. and now the stupid thing resizes it.... makes the forum less fun now.[/quote8b78cd6736]

agreed -/

cdmanproductions

21-03-2005 23:41:04

i didnt ever think the sigs were to big, i mean i know mine was kinda big but not like it was an issue. no body ever complaind about it to me or anything.

Mr Sofa Sets

22-03-2005 06:35:14

This rule is pointless. I understand your concern for the fact that morons have been posting vulgar pics and such, but that is one of the problems with the internet. Please do not limit the functionality of this forum due to some idiot posting vulgar pics. It the issue is having to do with bandwidth or Web Storage, you sould pony up the cash for a better hosting plan. That is what the donation are for after all arent they?

shifuimam

22-03-2005 07:39:02

I don't think it's just because of the tubgirl pics...it's freaking annoying to be reading a forum and have someone with a sig pic that's like 300 or 400 pixels tall, especially when you're running on a lower resolution (1024x768 - I don't, but I'm sure people here do). It takes up unnecessary space for the most part.

techdude05

22-03-2005 10:13:28

[quoteca9c4b6f13="shifuimam"]I don't think it's just because of the tubgirl pics...it's freaking annoying to be reading a forum and have someone with a sig pic that's like 300 or 400 pixels tall, especially when you're running on a lower resolution (1024x768 - I don't, but I'm sure people here do). It takes up unnecessary space for the most part.[/quoteca9c4b6f13]im running on 1024x768 right now...its not that low.

shifuimam

22-03-2005 12:19:02

LOL see, I've been running at no less than 1280x1024 ever since I figured out my old Dell 17" could run that high. Then I upgraded to a 19" and started running at 1600x1200 - I need all the desktop space I can get - I use virtual machines, photoshop, visual studio, etc a lot, so I like being able to see everything at once.

Now I'm at 1280x1024 on my FFS at home (plus the extra Samsung LCD I bought), and my laptop is SXGA+ at 1400x1050. It's all about personal preference, though.

Tholek

25-03-2005 17:52:56

It would be preferable if you set this function to preserve the aspect of the image during the resize to maximum limit.

ie resizing 520x397 to 327x250 etc.

Tholek

28-03-2005 19:52:56

[quote6b14688cb8="Admin"]This does not affect CURRENT sigs but will affect any new ones or if you change yours.[/quote6b14688cb8]

I'm afraid that's not true. (as you can see below)

It seems that if you change your profile for ANY reason, it will be fliliked up.

I hope you can fix that.....

EatChex89

28-03-2005 20:36:28

yea the whole image thing is gay. i think you should remove it, cuz now it makes EVERYONE's huge..

you could at least make a PHP code that only resizes it if it goes OVER.. (thats what i initially thought it did) the whole resize thing defeats the purpose.

Stroid

30-03-2005 22:13:05

I talked to the Admin he is on vacation and will take out the picture resize thing soon it will be out of here so it will be back to normal

PoPoJiJo

30-03-2005 23:05:37

thank you

EatChex89

31-03-2005 08:10:38

good show!

Tholek

01-04-2005 09:20:35

Woohoo, it's fixed!

I just went back into my profile to see my sig pics, and they now had a dimension value in the urls. [in brackets]

I just adjusted the dimension, and it's looks acceptable now. )

doylnea

07-04-2005 21:12:21

Have any idea why only certain sigs are showing up?

All of my imageshack hosted pics are down, as are others photobucket pics.

Admin

07-04-2005 21:17:16

Try editing them and removing the [numbernumber] part.

doylnea

07-04-2005 21:24:54

[quote48654ab0e9="Admin"]Try editing them and removing the [numbernumber] part.[/quote48654ab0e9]

You west-coasters are so smart. Good idea, as you can see, it worked...