The Air-Force tried to drop the "Gay Bomb"!

Air Force confirms $7.5M research request to develop 'gay bomb' to make enemy troops have sex with each other

Wow. 7 million on a bomb to make enemies have sex with each other. I wonder what kinds of things we are currently spending insane amounts of money on.

Got a link to verify this or something?

[quote980f2afd1b="tylerc"]Got a link to verify this or something?[/quote980f2afd1b]
I heard them talking about this on Elliot in the Mourning just today...

Sounds fake

http//www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,281217,00.html

sensationalize much? this is not particularly earth shattering, since no money was spent. i'm sure they have spent far more money on far crazier ideas.

What the hell? O_O

That's retarded.

wtf, is this necessary

[quote837121a4e5="TFOAF"]What the hell? O_O

That's retarded.[/quote837121a4e5]

[quote837121a4e5="junkie06"]wtf, is this necessary[/quote837121a4e5]


[quote837121a4e5="Admin"]sensationalize much? this is not particularly earth shattering, since no money was spent. i'm sure they have spent far more money on far crazier ideas.[/quote837121a4e5]

I believe what they intended on doing was just cloning TFOAF and dropping him and his new brothers onto unsuspecting Iraqi's.

This idea was developed in 1994...

Basically, this article says, "This is crazy, even though it doesn't matter anymore, but we just noticed so here it is."

[quote156416b3b1="ilanbg"]This idea was developed in 1994...

Basically, this article says, "This is crazy, even though it doesn't matter anymore, but we just noticed so here it is."[/quote156416b3b1]what would we do without your piercing analysis

You would have no one to love from afar.

The government spends way too much money on the wrong stuff. There is a plane that was supposed to be built for the military for like 20 years now.

It is supposed to take off like a helicopter but fly like a plane (400+mph and carry a bunch of troops) The military has been saying for years and years that it is flawed, it wont work and that they dont' want it.

But congress keeps putting more and more money into it. And after over 63 million it has still yet to go higher than a 2 feet off the ground before crashing.

edit not that they spent any money on this gay bomb, but I thought I'd put it out there.

[quote3b468e83f3="theysayjump"]I believe what they intended on doing was just cloning TFOAF and dropping him and his new brothers onto unsuspecting Iraqi's.[/quote3b468e83f3]
But...I'm not a sex maniac! ... And I wouldn't have homosexual sex. O_o...and I won't have sex with a girl unless I love her...or if she was super extremely hot and without STDs. P

LIES! ALL LIES I TELL YOU!!!

extremely hot or std's. take your pick. you can't have both.

That'd be effective though, and fun for the innocent civilians, as long as there's an equal number of malefemales...or the females outnumber the males...Or it's me, with like, 50 models for Victoria Secret and whatnot....Woah, I need to find a way to fund this bomb

lol the gay bomb, great way to eliminate reproduction in other countrys. we should fund this.

[quote9257474766="stueybaby17"]The government spends way too much money on the wrong stuff. There is a plane that was supposed to be built for the military for like 20 years now.

It is supposed to take off like a helicopter but fly like a plane (400+mph and carry a bunch of troops) The military has been saying for years and years that it is flawed, it wont work and that they dont' want it.

But congress keeps putting more and more money into it. And after over 63 million it has still yet to go higher than a 2 feet off the ground before crashing.

edit not that they spent any money on this gay bomb, but I thought I'd put it out there.[/quote9257474766]
LOL, where do you get your info?

It sounds like you're talking about the Osprey, but it flew a lot more than 2 feet off the ground. It's actually been in service for years in limited numbers. There have been four major crashes, including one while carrying a Marine unit on a simulated rescue mission. But it has been flying for years. The cost overruns to make it safer and more reliable have certainly been controversial, but it's still very much in production. 3 of 4 military branches have allocated orders with most going to the Marines, and the 4th branch (Army) is considering it. Israel is also interested in it. So it wouldn't be accurate to say that the military isn't "interested."

http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-22_Osprey

Aren't things like astral projection still being funded for "intelligence purposes"? Taxpayers must love that.

DMorris IS the gay bomb. playful

[quotef78b064a93="Tholek"]Aren't things like astral projection still being funded for "intelligence purposes"? Taxpayers must love that.[/quotef78b064a93]
Is it really? OMG. Yay. D But paying tax on it. O_o

[quote4fab6512a9="dmorris68"][quote4fab6512a9="stueybaby17"]The government spends way too much money on the wrong stuff. There is a plane that was supposed to be built for the military for like 20 years now.

It is supposed to take off like a helicopter but fly like a plane (400+mph and carry a bunch of troops) The military has been saying for years and years that it is flawed, it wont work and that they dont' want it.

But congress keeps putting more and more money into it. And after over 63 million it has still yet to go higher than a 2 feet off the ground before crashing.

edit not that they spent any money on this gay bomb, but I thought I'd put it out there.[/quote4fab6512a9]
LOL, where do you get your info?

It sounds like you're talking about the Osprey, but it flew a lot more than 2 feet off the ground. It's actually been in service for years in limited numbers. There have been four major crashes, including one while carrying a Marine unit on a simulated rescue mission. But it has been flying for years. The cost overruns to make it safer and more reliable have certainly been controversial, but it's still very much in production. 3 of 4 military branches have allocated orders with most going to the Marines, and the 4th branch (Army) is considering it. Israel is also interested in it. So it wouldn't be accurate to say that the military isn't "interested."

http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-22_Osprey[/quote4fab6512a9]

http//blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/06/the_aircraft_th.html

[quotec464761f3b="Tholek"]Aren't things like astral projection still being funded for "intelligence purposes"? Taxpayers must love that.[/quotec464761f3b]

i remember reacding that a study on remote veiwing was funded by the government as well.

Edit oh yeah it was on psipog
http//www.psipog.net/art-clairvoyance.html
[quotec464761f3b]First, let me start off by letting you know why I have written an article on this subject matter. In the beginning of the US government's psychic program, there was StarGate, who developed the processes now known as "Remote Viewing", and similar processes were used in Soviet Russia before the US started research. There are many articles on each of these techniques;[/quotec464761f3b]

Regarding that plane the US spent millions on your government is just miffed it never made THIS[=http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avro_arrow]THIS. So they had to settle for forcing us to stop production of it, and make a $63 million dollar paperweight. Ohhhh!! Sorry, had to.

[quoteeb5f14e168="theysayjump"][quoteeb5f14e168="dmorris68"][quoteeb5f14e168="stueybaby17"]The government spends way too much money on the wrong stuff. There is a plane that was supposed to be built for the military for like 20 years now.

It is supposed to take off like a helicopter but fly like a plane (400+mph and carry a bunch of troops) The military has been saying for years and years that it is flawed, it wont work and that they dont' want it.

But congress keeps putting more and more money into it. And after over 63 million it has still yet to go higher than a 2 feet off the ground before crashing.

edit not that they spent any money on this gay bomb, but I thought I'd put it out there.[/quoteeb5f14e168]
LOL, where do you get your info?

It sounds like you're talking about the Osprey, but it flew a lot more than 2 feet off the ground. It's actually been in service for years in limited numbers. There have been four major crashes, including one while carrying a Marine unit on a simulated rescue mission. But it has been flying for years. The cost overruns to make it safer and more reliable have certainly been controversial, but it's still very much in production. 3 of 4 military branches have allocated orders with most going to the Marines, and the 4th branch (Army) is considering it. Israel is also interested in it. So it wouldn't be accurate to say that the military isn't "interested."

http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-22_Osprey[/quoteeb5f14e168]

http//blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/06/the_aircraft_th.html[/quoteeb5f14e168]
Wow, I stand corrected. blush That's odd though, his original post almost described the issues with the Osprey to a tee. Except the Osprey's budget far exceeds $63M.

My apologies...

[quote24e735611a="dmorris68"][quote24e735611a="stueybaby17"]The government spends way too much money on the wrong stuff. There is a plane that was supposed to be built for the military for like 20 years now.

It is supposed to take off like a helicopter but fly like a plane (400+mph and carry a bunch of troops) The military has been saying for years and years that it is flawed, it wont work and that they dont' want it.

But congress keeps putting more and more money into it. And after over 63 million it has still yet to go higher than a 2 feet off the ground before crashing.

edit not that they spent any money on this gay bomb, but I thought I'd put it out there.[/quote24e735611a]
LOL, where do you get your info?

It sounds like you're talking about the Osprey, but it flew a lot more than 2 feet off the ground. It's actually been in service for years in limited numbers. There have been four major crashes, including one while carrying a Marine unit on a simulated rescue mission. But it has been flying for years. The cost overruns to make it safer and more reliable have certainly been controversial, but it's still very much in production. 3 of 4 military branches have allocated orders with most going to the Marines, and the 4th branch (Army) is considering it. Israel is also interested in it. So it wouldn't be accurate to say that the military isn't "interested."

http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-22_Osprey[/quote24e735611a]

Saw it on yesterdays 700 news.

edit this wasn't really necessary. . . I didn't notice TSJ's Post

[quotef54dfac486="JUNIOR6886"][quotef54dfac486="Tholek"]Aren't things like astral projection still being funded for "intelligence purposes"? Taxpayers must love that.[/quotef54dfac486]

i remember reacding that a study on remote veiwing was funded by the government as well.

Edit oh yeah it was on psipog
http//www.psipog.net/art-clairvoyance.html
[quotef54dfac486]First, let me start off by letting you know why I have written an article on this subject matter. In the beginning of the US government's psychic program, there was StarGate, who developed the processes now known as "Remote Viewing", and similar processes were used in Soviet Russia before the US started research. There are many articles on each of these techniques;[/quotef54dfac486][/quotef54dfac486]
Yeah, Their project was called Project Stargate. Oh...you posted that. P

>> http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_stargate

I'm waiting for Nike to release this as a Limited Edition low-top.

[quote9847f7196b="TFOAF"]And I wouldn't have homosexual sex. O_o...and I won't have sex with a girl unless I love her...or if she was super extremely hot and without STDs. P[/quote9847f7196b]

Your second statement contradicts the first one.

Stargate? Wow. The government could sue MGM over the film and series. D

http//biggercheese.com/comics/0659.png[" alt=""/imgbcb0c3994a]