IWantIt4Free.com Not true to their word!
i had a longgg convo with iwantit4freehelp, who owns www.iwantit4free.com
to make a long story short i wanted to help him out with his site for a free itrip. we made a deal that if i do an offer hell give me a 35 dollar web cert. he said hell give it right after a screen shot is shown and i sent him one.. he said no what college are you from, and asked me questions about myself which i was very uncomfortable with, anyway later he said "But it logs everytime someone clicks on an offer!" so his script was bought from epidemik, so i asked epidemik and he said "no" that it doesnt and then iwantit4free said its not the script its the affliate and once again epidmeik said it doesnt.
no one do this guys site it is very unprofessional, besides the amazing banner i made) he is not good for himself and is a scammer.
EpidemiK
10-01-2005 20:02:44
My script does not record clicks, CJ and SC record clicks but do not show the unique SID or UID, if that's what you're asking.
nivorous
10-01-2005 20:15:22
Guess karma caught up to you huh?
iWantIt4free
10-01-2005 20:43:21
What Jpac has said is not quite accurate and I felt the need to sign on just to clarify.
We tried to work out a deal, but he wanted immediate payment for an offer I wasn't sure he completed. He lied about his name and tried to cover it up, which further convinced me not to trust him.
As far as the clicks go. Search Cactus records each time someone clicks on a link, any owner can tell you that. It also records immediately, any owner can tell you that.
Jpac said he did the blockbuster offer and gave a fairly convincing screenshot. But Search Cactus showed that nobody had clicked on the link for blockbuster yet today!
For the record If the offer does go through I will post 1000 points to Jpac's account on iWantIt4free.com just like any other member. And I will pay him $3 or 300 points for the banners that he made for my sites, though I had previously said I wasn't interested in paying for his graphic work.
Hope that clears things up here. Sorry I won't be a regular poster.
P.S. Please email= me if you are interested in reading the entire conversation log I had with Jpac. email=info@iwantit4free.cominfo@iwantit4free.com me if you are interested in reading the entire conversation log I had with Jpac. email=info@iwantit4free.cominfo@iwantit4free.com/email
yeah, you say youll give me 10 dollars, our deal was 35 dollars.. tahs why your not legit. "oh ill jut give yuou ten" also, im sure that the majority of people here have lied about there atleast last name for personal reasons
ItmPls
11-01-2005 04:52:17
lol@ people still signing up for sites...
FreeOffersNow
11-01-2005 05:59:40
Jpac you stole the text theme from J&T Cooper...that wasn't very nice.
ItmPls
11-01-2005 06:26:08
And no one else stole some text/design from someone else's website?
[quote742ca9b4ed]Jpac you stole the text theme from J&T Cooper...that wasn't very nice.[/quote742ca9b4ed]
where can we see this?
iWantIt4free, nothing against your deal, I've not even checked it out yet (not interested in point based offers), but aren't you a bit uncomfortable that Epidemik, the author of the script you bought and now use seems to disagree with you? At least, it makes me either uncomfortable with your website or with Epidemik's script. Which one of the two is the least unreliable?
thanks in advance for your answer(s).
Narakukuku
11-01-2005 06:42:33
No offense but I would think twice before I signed up for a site that listed an AIM username in the fine text.
ItmPls
11-01-2005 06:52:04
I wouldn't
Some corporate sites use AIM. It's a smart method. Screw telephones and email. It's way faster too.
I would be doing that if I had a company and I was on AIM all the time.
Only thing is some people wouldn't believe you because most of the users of AIM are like teenagers..
It's a smart method though. P
phorty
11-01-2005 08:00:47
ItmPls has a good point as far as logistics are concerned , but in a reality based situation i think i'd go with Narakukukukukuku because...well...its just kinda suspicious, because just like you said their is a preconceived notion that most AIM users are devious teenagers (like me!). D
FreeOffersNow
11-01-2005 11:59:06
[quote1f816ada38="ItmPls"]I wouldn't
Some corporate sites use AIM. It's a smart method. Screw telephones and email. It's way faster too.
I would be doing that if I had a company and I was on AIM all the time.
Only thing is some people wouldn't believe you because most of the users of AIM are like teenagers..
It's a smart method though. P[/quote1f816ada38]
In most cases, AIM isn't a very smart method at all...mainly for security reasons. It's very difficult to confirm who you are speaking with over AIM.
EDIT Sorry l0th, here is the banner

http//www.iwantit4free.com/images/logo.gif[" alt=""/img1f816ada38]
Maybe it's just me and they didn't intend for the text to look anything like
[img="1f816ada38]http//www.tech4free.com/images/tech4free.gif[" alt=""/img1f816ada38]
(Note the similarity licoughliexact matchlicoughli of the RGB/color scheme)
iWantIt4free
11-01-2005 12:13:11
[quote32689e57b7="l0th"]
iWantIt4free, nothing against your deal, I've not even checked it out yet (not interested in point based offers), but aren't you a bit uncomfortable that Epidemik, the author of the script you bought and now use seems to disagree with you? At least, it makes me either uncomfortable with your website or with Epidemik's script. Which one of the two is the least unreliable?
thanks in advance for your answer(s).[/quote32689e57b7]
To clarify for everyone I'll explain this situation. Hopefully this will clear things up and I'm sure Epidemik can help clarify.
I told Jpac that my records indicated that he hadn't even clicked on the link. He took that to mean that somewhere in the script of my site I can see who clicks where, and so he IMed epidemik about it. And of course Epidemik said no his script does not record where you click.
The Fact is that the clicks are recorded by the affiliate site (SC and CJ) and they record instantly. It showed no one had clicked on blockbuster yet that day, which makes it impossible for him to have completed the offer unless there was an error somewhere.
As it turns out today I have not recieved a commission for any blockbuster offers.
I don't want to declare Jpac cheated on this, but it's difficult to believe he followed through on his end. It's pretty easy to save a confirmation webpage and pull it up and type in the right url and take a screen shot.
To Jpac I am more then willing to try and work things out. I'd love to find a way to settle this where we are both happy.
As for AIM for customer service, I might try a different support system if more people see it as unprofessional.
ok, freeoffersnow, i didnt even look at tech4free when i made that. i though well we gotta seperate the words in the url without putting spaces. oh i know ill add color! i chose blue because iwantit4free told me he likes light blues so stop thinking i copy stuff.
FreeOffersNow
11-01-2005 12:36:35
[quote4b5187faf9="FreeOffersNow"]Maybe it's just me and they didn't intend for the text to look anything like[/quote4b5187faf9]
jadem
11-01-2005 13:31:07
[quote46ca4fd734="FreeOffersNow"][quote46ca4fd734="FreeOffersNow"]Maybe it's just me and they didn't intend for the text to look anything like[/quote46ca4fd734][/quote46ca4fd734]
Some people. roll
EatChex89
11-01-2005 13:39:22
yea the site doesn't look very professional either.
EpidemiK
11-01-2005 20:48:38
I just want to make something clear here. I am not contradicting iWantit4Free's statements. Jpac asked if my script recorded when people clicked offers, and I simply said "No." The publisher sites like CJ or SC however DO record clicks instantly. I do not believe that iWantit4Free is a scammer. Why would he purchase my scripts or put up his picture and a short bio on the site if he was a scammer? Might as well use the freeipods.de script if you're going to scam.
ok me and iwantit4freehelp were talking and we negotiated, turns out he sent me it and i did his offer, its all good! highly recommended~
FreeOffersNow
12-01-2005 14:43:33
rofl.