Annoy me, go to jail.

Live forum: http://forum.freeipodguide.com/viewtopic.php?t=30090

KeithA

09-01-2006 09:07:11

[quote183d3df3b2="Cnet"]A new federal law states that when you annoy someone on the Internet, you must disclose your identity. Here's the relevant language.

"Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person...who receives the communications...shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."[/quote183d3df3b2]

Full story here

http//news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyance%2C+go+to+jail/2010-1028_3-6022491.html?part=rss&tag=6022491&subj=news[]http//news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyance%2C+go+to+jail/2010-1028_3-6022491.html?part=rss&tag=6022491&subj=news


I will be enforcing the new law like DUIs on Super Bowl Sunday here at FIPG. If you annoy one of the users, you'll likely get a fine. Annoy me, and I'm pushing for jail. (Unless, of course, you use your real name.)


roll

MyungChunHa

09-01-2006 09:13:43

huh?
so i cant say screw you, youre an ignorant bastard evil without saying, hi my name is kevin D first?

seriously though.....how can annoying be a crime....i understand intent to harm....but opinion, last time i checked, is our right.....

JOSHBOX

09-01-2006 09:20:03

thanks again to our president -)

johnjimjones

09-01-2006 09:41:50

[quote8a778f01cd="KeithA"][quote8a778f01cd="Cnet"]A new federal law states that when you annoy someone on the Internet, you must disclose your identity. Here's the relevant language.

"Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person...who receives the communications...shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."[/quote8a778f01cd]

Full story here

http//news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyance%2C+go+to+jail/2010-1028_3-6022491.html?part=rss&tag=6022491&subj=news[]http//news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyance%2C+go+to+jail/2010-1028_3-6022491.html?part=rss&tag=6022491&subj=news


I will be enforcing the new law like DUIs on Super Bowl Sunday here at FIPG. If you annoy one of the users, you'll likely get a fine. Annoy me, and I'm pushing for jail. (Unless, of course, you use your real name.)


roll[/quote8a778f01cd]
lalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalav
lalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalala
lalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalav
lalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalala
lalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalav
lalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalala
lalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalav
lalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalala
lalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalav
lalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalala
lalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalav
lalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalala
[quote8a778f01cd="JOSHBOX"]thanks again to our president -)[/quote8a778f01cd]
roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll roll

Hi my name is JohnJones please send me to jail.

Jake

09-01-2006 09:42:01

Welcome to fascism.

Take a number please.

crazyates

09-01-2006 10:31:55

haha...what a stupid idea...another example of the government in action protecting us all....

that's a lot of lalala/rolling eyes....

KyleRaker

09-01-2006 10:46:52

Just extending the laws of the paper world to the e-world. You would want somebody to be fined or thrown in jail if someone was writing threatening and harassing letters to your children and family. I don't see how that's different from laws regulating harassing letters to your mailbox. In fact there was a similar case involving a person sending sexually explicit material to someone's house who didn't want it and the government found this to be unacceptable and the vendor did not have a first amendment right to send it (Rowan vs. United States Post Office Department). A similar problem could have arose on the internet.

Jake

09-01-2006 11:10:48

[quote16520b0037="KyleRaker"]Just extending the laws of the paper world to the e-world. You would want somebody to be fined or thrown in jail if someone was writing threatening and harassing letters to your children and family. I don't see how that's different from laws regulating harassing letters to your mailbox. In fact there was a similar case involving a person sending sexually explicit material to someone's house who didn't want it and the government found this to be unacceptable and the vendor did not have a first amendment right to send it (Rowan vs. United States Post Office Department). A similar problem could have arose on the internet.[/quote16520b0037]

They can barely enforce spam laws.

This law should be enforced only in very specific instances. For example, if I sent you threatening emails/messages to you and you truly felt in danger, then this would be a good reason to react.

If I tell you that I think you're dumb in an argument over an issue (not that I think so, this is just an example), then I don't think that the police should be coming to knock at my door.

Exile

09-01-2006 12:38:52

Booga Booga X 100000 infinity!

thehacker010

09-01-2006 13:02:37

I think I will send an email to my local congressman with this law quoted; followed by the "O RLY" owl.... hehehe

tylerc

09-01-2006 13:37:11

GOOD ONE!

roll

thehacker010

09-01-2006 13:42:07

I would just like to say to johnjimjones that thread stretching really annoys me.

tylerc

09-01-2006 13:43:02

Yeah, i agree.

liquidskin

09-01-2006 13:51:51

lmao.. hilarious.

Wolfeman

09-01-2006 13:59:18

You guys are looking at this all wrong. I saw Bush interview on the net last night and it annoyed the shit out of me. He's going down...

TheChangedMan

09-01-2006 14:53:05

[quote8a4df06e1e="Jake"][quote8a4df06e1e="KyleRaker"]Just extending the laws of the paper world to the e-world. You would want somebody to be fined or thrown in jail if someone was writing threatening and harassing letters to your children and family. I don't see how that's different from laws regulating harassing letters to your mailbox. In fact there was a similar case involving a person sending sexually explicit material to someone's house who didn't want it and the government found this to be unacceptable and the vendor did not have a first amendment right to send it (Rowan vs. United States Post Office Department). A similar problem could have arose on the internet.[/quote8a4df06e1e]

They can barely enforce spam laws.

This law should be enforced only in very specific instances. For example, if I sent you threatening emails/messages to you and you truly felt in danger, then this would be a good reason to react.

If I tell you that I think you're dumb in an argument over an issue (not that I think so, this is just an example), then I don't think that the police should be coming to knock at my door.[/quote8a4df06e1e]

I agree, this is impossible to enforce.

doylnea

09-01-2006 15:18:57

[quote1eff997ffa="TheChangedMan"]I agree, this is impossible to enforce.[/quote1eff997ffa]
Bye bye TheSiege

Automag389

09-01-2006 15:50:59

The Supreme Court will strike this down; it's a clear violation of the 1st amendment.

tylerc

09-01-2006 15:53:01

The right to swing your arm ends where the other person's nose begins.

johnjimjones

09-01-2006 16:42:30

[quote7988659586="thehacker010"]I would just like to say to johnjimjones that thread stretching really annoys me.[/quote7988659586]

Sue me. P That was the point of the post. D I hate it too.

MyungChunHa

09-01-2006 16:53:04

[quoteb567b37bb0="Wolfeman"]You guys are looking at this all wrong. I saw Bush interview on the net last night and it annoyed the shit out of me. He's going down...[/quoteb567b37bb0]
lol......good one.....how about some karma.....

crazyates

09-01-2006 19:29:19

[quote9bc18e55c9="Wolfeman"]You guys are looking at this all wrong. I saw Bush interview on the net last night and it annoyed the shit out of me. He's going down...[/quote9bc18e55c9]

why? who ever said this was bush's doing?

Wolfeman

09-01-2006 19:37:58

Its his administration and its his party that runs the congress and senate. He proabably got flamed while on SA forums and ran out to make the law...

tylerc

09-01-2006 19:39:09

Just because Congress/Senate are Republican majority doesn't mean it was Bush's idea.

Wolfeman

09-01-2006 19:41:19

Its his party. He is the leader of it. Oh and...

[quotede87fdb7d6]It's no joke. Last Thursday, [bde87fdb7d6]President Bush signed into law[/bde87fdb7d6] a prohibition on posting annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without disclosing your true identity.[/quotede87fdb7d6]

If he wasn't for it he could've vetoed it...

MyungChunHa

09-01-2006 19:41:26

[quote1e00a09e75="crazyates"][quote1e00a09e75="Wolfeman"]You guys are looking at this all wrong. I saw Bush interview on the net last night and it annoyed the shit out of me. He's going down...[/quote1e00a09e75]

why? who ever said this was bush's doing?[/quote1e00a09e75]
he never said that this was bushs doing....he was just making a joke....

Wolfeman

09-01-2006 19:45:38

Seriously but he signed it into law. He should've vetoed the retarded thing and been like...
http//www.orlyowl.com/upload/files/bush_orly.jpg[" alt=""/img96e4bcbdfe]