TR Suggestion

Live forum: http://forum.freeipodguide.com/viewtopic.php?t=19645

ilanbg

08-08-2005 10:09:03

To receive TR, both parties need to complete their end of the agreement. We all know that.

So when someone gets scammed, not only are they getting screwed out of a green, but they're also getting screwed out of +1 TR.

Wouldn't it make sense for someone to get TR whenever they uphold their end of the bargain, or give TR to whoever did their end of a trade with a known scammer?

wood

08-08-2005 10:12:02

Who is going to confirm you ever went green for the scammer?

Couldnt me and you do a trade. You have to go first. You never go green, but we still have the open trade module.
You claim scammage and want trade record even though you never went green...

liquidskin

08-08-2005 10:12:49

sorry... I dont think this would work.

slease

08-08-2005 10:14:12

Also, theres no point in putting your TR record from other sites in your signature, they aren't valid here.

ilanbg

08-08-2005 10:14:38

wood Yes. That's not what I was suggesting. I meant we give TR to those who did their end of a trade with someone who is later banned for scamming. A mod would review the trading module and see that Person A went yellow, then two days later went green, then send multiple PMs to Person B, who was later banned for scamming.
Basically, Person A would get SOMETHING for going green, even though they were scammed.

slease Thanks for the info. I'll edit my sig now.

liquidskin

08-08-2005 10:16:48

[quotea89026e94c="ilanbg"]Yes. That's not what I was suggesting. I meant we give TR to those who did their end of a trade with someone who is later banned for scamming. A mod would review the trading module and see that Person A went yellow, then two days later went green, then send multiple PMs to Person B, who was later banned for scamming.
Basically, Person A would get SOMETHING for going green.

slease Thanks for the info. I'll edit my sign now.[/quotea89026e94c]

how would the mod know the person went green? the only person who would know that is the scammer.

justinag06

08-08-2005 13:57:04

yeah thats true, but look at some of the scammer thread's out there.

Look at frankgratis that thread has been there for quite a while now, he never bothered to discredit anyone that claimed they greened for him. It is easy to see the first 15 people in the thread went green. So it could work on some level

plus we could take a screenshot of the site we joined and show our status page. I think that would be enough proof

J4320

08-08-2005 14:04:04

[quotead203f2c36="liquidskin"]sorry... I dont think this would work.[/quotead203f2c36]

ditto

Exile

08-08-2005 14:04:31

[quotec82de57090="wood"]Who is going to confirm you ever went green for the scammer?

Couldnt me and you do a trade. You have to go first. You never go green, but we still have the open trade module.
You claim scammage and want trade record even though you never went green...[/quotec82de57090]

Would need some sort of proof

theclownoftightness

08-08-2005 14:09:47

A screenshot not excluding your email and such sent to the mod might work

J4320

08-08-2005 14:10:34

Or you could try to get official word from the Admin of the free site that you did in fact do an offer.

justinag06

08-08-2005 14:15:56

yeah I think if the person who is said scammer can't provide a screenshot of his referalls with the date and time and you being yellow. Yet you can provide such a screenshot of your account being yellow that should be enough.

However what wood is saying is right, we don't want people crying wolf just to get TR from this.

liquidskin

08-08-2005 14:17:28

You think the mods will want to be looking at screenshots and trying to figure out whats legit and whats not? No.

just about everyone here has been scammed at one point in another.. its an unfortunate learning experience. just deal with the fact that you missed out on a +TR and use your newly acquired knowledge to make good trades.

wood

08-08-2005 14:24:16

[quote8498dcd536="liquidskin"]You think the mods will want to be looking at screenshots and trying to figure out whats legit and whats not? No.[/quote8498dcd536]

liquidskin

08-08-2005 14:28:01

[quote2d3eb946a4="wood"][quote2d3eb946a4="liquidskin"]You think the mods will want to be looking at screenshots and trying to figure out whats legit and whats not? No.[/quote2d3eb946a4][/quote2d3eb946a4]


ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooh.... you're in troubbbblllleeeee

[quote2d3eb946a4="Admin"]So, from now on, replies that merely quote someone before them without adding anything will result in a one day temporary ban. I've had enough of it. [/quote2d3eb946a4]

Dont worry, I wont tell if you dont.

slease

08-08-2005 14:48:10

Wood's a rebel, he doesn't follow rules.

J4320

08-08-2005 14:51:25

[quote5eef0b003a="wood"][quote5eef0b003a="liquidskin"]You think the mods will want to be looking at screenshots and trying to figure out whats legit and whats not? No.[/quote5eef0b003a][/quote5eef0b003a]

Bad bad wood. Quoting and not saying anything. That'll be 60 bucks please.

PumaPride77

08-08-2005 15:13:15

I'm telling!

EatChex89

08-08-2005 16:11:13

[quote0c9272eae4="liquidskin"]sorry... I dont think this would work.[/quote0c9272eae4]

..

FreeOffersNow

08-08-2005 16:42:05

Good intentions, but it's just not practical.

geej86

08-08-2005 18:49:51

[quote0b9288a7d3="slease"]Wood's a rebel, he doesn't follow rules.[/quote0b9288a7d3]

not even his own










/family guy