massman
22-11-2006 10:10:25
anyone else with me on this one?
CollidgeGraduit
22-11-2006 10:26:19
[quote7dc6a2a775="massman"]anyone else with me on this one?[/quote7dc6a2a775]
Nope. They'll stay with the rating they were given by the council that rated all the sites. Wouldn't arbitrarily assigning a rating defeat the purpose of a group of FIPG members rating sites, and then averaging those scores?
massman
22-11-2006 17:32:16
[quoted154dea623="CollidgeGraduit"][quoted154dea623="massman"]anyone else with me on this one?[/quoted154dea623]
Nope. They'll stay with the rating they were given by the council that rated all the sites. Wouldn't arbitrarily assigning a rating defeat the purpose of a group of FIPG members rating sites, and then averaging those scores?[/quoted154dea623]
ohhh, i had thought they liwereli arbitrarily assigned, i didn't see the http//forum.freeipodguide.com/coe/site_ratings.php thread.
my b oops
CollidgeGraduit
22-11-2006 19:28:25
[quote4866c6effb="massman"][quote4866c6effb="CollidgeGraduit"][quote4866c6effb="massman"]anyone else with me on this one?[/quote4866c6effb]
Nope. They'll stay with the rating they were given by the council that rated all the sites. Wouldn't arbitrarily assigning a rating defeat the purpose of a group of FIPG members rating sites, and then averaging those scores?[/quote4866c6effb]
ohhh, i had thought they liwereli arbitrarily assigned, i didn't see the http//forum.freeipodguide.com/coe/site_ratings.php thread.
my b oops[/quote4866c6effb]
No problem ) There was a group of 10-15 people I believe that rated the networks they had completed sites for.