motion to drop "Freepay Site" to Sites Rated 1.9 -

Live forum: http://forum.freeipodguide.com/viewtopic.php?t=48814

massman

22-11-2006 10:10:25

anyone else with me on this one?

CollidgeGraduit

22-11-2006 10:26:19

[quote7dc6a2a775="massman"]anyone else with me on this one?[/quote7dc6a2a775]

Nope. They'll stay with the rating they were given by the council that rated all the sites. Wouldn't arbitrarily assigning a rating defeat the purpose of a group of FIPG members rating sites, and then averaging those scores?

massman

22-11-2006 17:32:16

[quoted154dea623="CollidgeGraduit"][quoted154dea623="massman"]anyone else with me on this one?[/quoted154dea623]

Nope. They'll stay with the rating they were given by the council that rated all the sites. Wouldn't arbitrarily assigning a rating defeat the purpose of a group of FIPG members rating sites, and then averaging those scores?[/quoted154dea623]
ohhh, i had thought they liwereli arbitrarily assigned, i didn't see the http//forum.freeipodguide.com/coe/site_ratings.php thread.

my b oops

CollidgeGraduit

22-11-2006 19:28:25

[quote4866c6effb="massman"][quote4866c6effb="CollidgeGraduit"][quote4866c6effb="massman"]anyone else with me on this one?[/quote4866c6effb]

Nope. They'll stay with the rating they were given by the council that rated all the sites. Wouldn't arbitrarily assigning a rating defeat the purpose of a group of FIPG members rating sites, and then averaging those scores?[/quote4866c6effb]
ohhh, i had thought they liwereli arbitrarily assigned, i didn't see the http//forum.freeipodguide.com/coe/site_ratings.php thread.

my b oops[/quote4866c6effb]

No problem ) There was a group of 10-15 people I believe that rated the networks they had completed sites for.