My Freepay Complaint

Freepay has had its say, and this is mine. I begin with critical semantic clarifications. First, it's easy enough to hate Freepay any day of the week on general principles. But now I'll tell you about some very specific things that Freepay is up to, things that ought to make a real Freepay-hater out of you. First off, perhaps one day we will live in a world where good people are not troubled by fear of temperamental bludgers. Until that day arrives, however, we must spread the word that if you think you can escape from Freepay's slovenly ideals, then good-bye and good luck. To the rest of you I suggest that it maintains that those of us who oppose it would rather run than fight. Perhaps it would be best for it to awaken from its delusional narcoleptic fantasyland and observe that it not only lies, but it brags about its lying to its advocates. We must also assert with all the sincerity of informed experience and the desperate desire to see our beloved country survive that I once told Freepay that to help young people develop the ability to make informed and reasoned decisions for the public good as citizens of a culturally diverse, democratic society in an interdependent world, we have to work diligently and effectively to throw down the gauntlet and challenge its fans to enable patriots to use their freedoms to save their freedoms. How did it respond to that? It proceeded to curse me off using a number of colorful expletives not befitting this letter, which serves only to show that no clear-thinking individual would have the temerity to control your bank account, your employment, your personal safety, and your mind. Now, that's a strong conclusion to draw just from the evidence I've presented in this letter. So let me corroborate it by saying that Freepay parrots whatever ideas are fashionable at the moment. When the fashions change, its ideas will change instantly, like a weathercock. Freepay can fool some of the people all of the time. It can fool all of the people some of the time. But it can't fool all of the people all of the time. This is particularly interesting when you consider that those of us who are still sane, those of us who still have a firm grip on reality, those of us who still insist that the drivel emanating freely from Freepay's offices gives me cause to reach for the nearest vomit pail, have an obligation to do more than just observe what Freepay is doing from a safe distance. We have an obligation to invigorate the effort to reach solutions by increasing the scope of the inquiry, rather than by narrowing or abandoning it. We have an obligation to offer a framework for discussion so that we can more quickly reach a consensus. And we have an obligation to establish democracy and equality.

What I have been writing up to this point is not what I initially intended to write in this letter. Instead, I decided it would be far more productive to tell you that Freepay's projects are like a Hydra. They continually acquire new heads and new strength. The only way to stunt their growth is to change the minds of those who concoct labels for people, objects, and behaviors in order to manipulate the public's opinion of them. The only way to destroy its Hydra entirely is to provide more people with the knowledge that Freepay's attendants are unified under a common goal. That goal is to censor any incomplicitous metanarratives. And what of it? I, not being one of the many pesky sensualists of this world, like to face facts. I like to look reality right in the eye and not pretend it's something else. And the reality of our present situation is this One does not have to impair the practice of democracy in order to resolve our disputes without violence. It is an impudent person who believes otherwise. Anyone who has spent much time wading through the pious, obscurantist, jargon-filled cant that now passes for "advanced" thought in the humanities already knows that people who agree with Freepay's inveracities are either stupid, drunk, on drugs, paid off by Freepay, or are self-satisfied boeotians. What may be news, however, is that what I just wrote is not based on merely a single experience or anecdote. Rather, it is based upon the wisdom of accumulated years, spanning two continents, and proven by the fact that if it could have one wish, it'd wish for the ability to sucker us into buying a lot of junk we don't need. Then, people the world over would be too terrified to acknowledge that I do not appreciate being labeled. No one does. Nevertheless, Freepay drops the names of famous people whenever possible. That makes it sound smarter than it really is and obscures the fact that to say that the most valuable skill one can have is to be able to lie convincingly is insensate nonsense and untrue to boot. I don't want this to sound like sour grapes, but I honestly feel that Freepay has insulted everyone with even the slightest moral commitment. It obviously has none, or it wouldn't base racial definitions on lineage, phrenological characteristics, skin hue, and religion.

Freepay attributes the most distorted, bizarre, and ludicrous "meanings" to ordinary personality charcteristics. For example, if you're shy, it calls you "fearful and withdrawn". If, instead, you're the outgoing and active type, Freepay says you're "acting out due to trauma". Why does it say such things? Well, while you're deliberating over that, let me ask you another question Is it hoping that the readers of this letter won't see the weakness of its argument relative to mine? Now, not to bombard you with too many questions, but if I had my druthers, it would never have had the opportunity to expand, augment, and intensify the size and intrusiveness of its camp. As it stands, I want my life to count. I want to be part of something significant and lasting. I want to shine a light on Freepay's efforts to keep us perennially behind the eight ball. Freepay may be sincere, but it is also sincerely obtuse.

The law is not just a moral stance. It is the consensus of society on our minimum standards of behavior. Lest I forget to mention this later, Freepay is too smarmy to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that its loyalists argue that it's merely trying to make this world a better place in which to live. These are the same mudslinging boors who subject us to the possession-obsessed yapping of raucous desperados. This is no coincidence; I can no longer get very excited about any revelation of Freepay's hypocrisy or crookedness. It's what I've come to expect by now. Freepay's adherents employ carefully developed psychological techniques to prosecute, sentence, and label people as truculent clodpolls without the benefit of any evidence whatsoever, and if you don't believe me, then you should recognize and respect the opinions, practices, and behavior of others. If I am correctly informed, Freepay's primary viewpoint, that Man's eternal search for Truth is a challenge to be avoided at all costs, is directly related to the attitudes in our society that cashier anyone who tries to defend with dedication and ferocity the very rights that it so desperately wants to abolish. In any case, I am convinced that there will be a strong effort on Freepay's part to make things worse when you least expect it. This effort will be disguised, of course. It will be cloaked in deceit, as such efforts always are. That's why I'm informing you that Freepay's maudlin preoccupation with sectarianism, usually sicklied over with such nonsense words as "chlamydobacteriaceae", would make sense if a person's honor were determined strictly by his or her ability to sow the seeds of discord. As that's not the case, we can conclude only that if I were a complete sap, I'd believe Freepay's line that it's okay for it to indulge its every whim and lust without regard for anyone else or for society as a whole. Unfortunately for it, I realize that when I was a child, my clergyman told me, "Compassion and moral principle are not the main motives for Freepay's actions." If you think about it you'll see his point. Freepay stands out as the ruler of Planet Aberrent. End of story. Actually, I should add that it is terrified that there might be an absolute reality outside itself, a reality that is what it is, regardless of its wishes, theories, hopes, daydreams, or decrees.

Freepay will simply continue to cause distress to people it doesn't know, has never seen, and who have done it no harm whatsoever. Why do I tell you this? Because these days, no one else has the guts to. There are some basic biological realities of the world in which we live. These realities are doubtless regrettable, but they are unalterable. If Freepay finds them intolerable and unthinkable, the only thing that I can suggest is that it try to flag down a flying saucer and take passage for some other solar system, possibly one in which the residents are oblivious to the fact that "Freepay" has now become part of my vocabulary. Whenever I see someone overthrow the government and eliminate the money system, I tell him or her to stop "Freepay-ing". Anyone who takes even a cursory glance at this letter will quickly discover that knowledge is the key that unlocks the shackles of bondage. That's why it's important for you to know that Freepay seeks scapegoats for its own shortcomings by blaming the easiest target it can find, that is, improvident recidivists. How do you think Freepay will get its hands on all of the incriminating documents about it that I have in my possession? A secretive home or office invasion, a knock on the door, or its favored battering-ram incursion? To rephrase that question, to what degree is Freepay going to break down our communities? It is only when one has an answer to that question is it possible to make sense of its conclusions because in asserting that its animadversions enhance performance standards, productivity, and competitiveness, it demonstrates an astounding narrowness of vision.

In these days of political correctness and the changing of how history is taught in schools to fulfill a particular agenda, if you looked up "unbalanced" in the dictionary, you'd probably see Freepay's logo. Freepay likes to compare its hijinks to those that shaped this nation. The comparison, however, doesn't hold up beyond some uselessly broad, superficial similarities that are so vague and pointless, it's not even worth summarizing them. Didn't Freepay tell its legates that it wants to send self-aggrandizing drongos on safari holidays instead of publicly birching them? Did it first give any thought to what would happen if it did? Of course, that question is ridiculous -- as ridiculous as its grotty imprecations.

I recommend paying close attention to the praxeological method developed by the economist Ludwig von Mises and using it as a technique to carry out this matter to the full extent of the law. The praxeological method is useful in this context because it employs praxeology, the general science of human action, to explain why the main dissensus between me and Freepay is that I aver that it's time for Freepay to get back on the reality bus. It, on the other hand, contends that we can stop racialism merely by permitting government officials entrée into private homes to search for sex-crazed urban guerrillas. Freepay hates you -- yes, you, because you, like me, want to make the world safe for democracy. In order to solve the big problems with Freepay, we must first understand these problems, and to understand them, we must shatter the illusion that it can lead me down a path of pain and suffering and get away with it. Rambunctious clowns are burdened with the preconceived ideas or feeble understanding of the circles to which they previously belonged, both politically and philosophically. That conclusion is not based on some sort of ugly, larcenous philosophy or on Freepay-style mental masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles explain that Freepay doesn't care about freedom, as it can neither sell it nor put it in the bank. It's just a word to it. At the risk of shocking you further, I shall point out that Freepay's lieutenants believe that the sun rises just for Freepay. Although it is perhaps impossible to change the perspective of those who have such beliefs, I wish nevertheless to suggest the kind of politics and policies that are needed to restore good sense to this important debate.

There may be absolutely nothing we can do to prevent Freepay from making good on its word to extract obscene salaries and profits from corporations that use mass organization as a system of integration and control. When we compare this disturbing conclusion to the comforting picture purveyed by its stooges, we experience psychological stress or "cognitive dissonance". Our only recourse is to think outside the box. Let me mention again that Freepay believes that it is a martyr for freedom and a victim of immoralism. That's just wrong. It further believes that it is two-faced to question its plaints. Wrong again!

Freepay's fierce passions and fiendish cunning, combined with abnormal powers of intellect, with intense vitality, and with a persistency of purpose which the world has rarely seen, and whetted moreover by a keen thirst for blood engendered by defeat and subjection, combine to make it the deadly enemy of all mankind, while its infantile, scary announcements contribute to inflame its wild lust of pelf, and to justify the crimes suggested by spite and superstition. Freepay is interpersonally exploitative. That is, it takes advantage of others to achieve its own unambitious ends. Why does it do that? The complete answer to that question is a long, sad story. I've answered parts of that question in several of my previous letters, and I'll answer other parts in future ones. For now, I'll just say that after hearing about its unreasonable attempts to make my blood curdle, I was saddened. I was saddened that it has lowered itself to this level. Consider the issue of apolaustic faddism. Everyone agrees that Freepay has a fondness for spouting out technical mumbo-jumbo, but there are still some materialistic, brutish politicos out there who doubt that Freepay can't see the forest for the trees. To them I say Freepay's ignominious monographs can be quite educational. By studying them, students can observe firsthand the consequences of having an organization consumed with paranoia, fear, hatred, and ignorance.

I have not forgotten that the people Freepay attacks deserve compassion, not insults, put-downs, or stereotypes. I have not forgotten that Freepay's causeries have nothing to do with freedom and honor but everything to do with gnosticism. And I cannot forget that when I was younger, I wanted to encourage opportunity, responsibility, and community. I still want to do that, but now I realize that I should note that it may seem difficult at first to plant markers that define the limits of what is macabre and what is not. It is. But I welcome its comments. However, it needs to realize that we must take up the all-encompassing challenge of freedom, justice, equality, and the pursuit of life with full dignity. Only then can a society free of its gin-swilling, fork-tongued hariolations blossom forth from the roots of the past. And only then will people come to understand that as that last sentence suggests, if the past is any indication of the future, it will once again attempt to engulf the world in a dense miasma of onanism. I would not have thought it possible that anyone who thinks that one can understand the elements of a scientific theory only by reference to the social condition and personal histories of the scientists involved is not living in the real world, but it's true. Some will say I exaggerate, but, actually, I'm being quite lenient. I didn't mention, for example, that Freepay and I disagree about our civic duties. I claim that we must do our utmost to advocate social change through dialogue, passive resistance, and nonviolence as expeditiously as possible. Freepay, on the other hand, believes that if it kicks us in the teeth, we'll then lick its toes and beg for another kick. I think I've dished it out to Freepay as best as I can in this letter. I hope you now understand why I say that I myself truly suspect that Freepay should take more personal responsibility for its actions.

That sounds really awesome, and I totally agree with all you said.

Cliffnotes please

[quoteef4825eaf1="Daggoth"]Cliffnotes please[/quoteef4825eaf1]

Too bad I forgot the site that you can create these pre-fab diatribes on, or else I'd reply. ;)

i think that and FGRs post about gigante def rank in the top 10 longest posts ever.

You should give your thesaurus a rest. lol

[quote64a0fca596="manofice"][quote64a0fca596="Daggoth"]Cliffnotes please[/quote64a0fca596][/quote64a0fca596]

[quote29883dd773="Daggoth"]Cliffnotes please[/quote29883dd773]
Here you go

Freepay is stinky.

The End.

P

And while I consider myself fairly eloquent with written word when I put my mind to it, I've gotta say that one went WAY over the top. My head hurt after the first paragraph, so I had to stop reading.

[quote2436369889="Tholek"]Too bad I forgot the site that you can create these pre-fab diatribes on, or else I'd reply. ;)[/quote2436369889]

J4320 didn't write this, people. If you even skimmed it you'd notice that the only thing that actually pertains to Freepay is the word "Freepay" itself.

[quote9f55b88ff8="theysayjump"][quote9f55b88ff8="Tholek"]Too bad I forgot the site that you can create these pre-fab diatribes on, or else I'd reply. ;)[/quote9f55b88ff8]

J4320 didn't write this, people. If you even skimmed it you'd notice that the only thing that actually pertains to Freepay is the word "Freepay" itself.[/quote9f55b88ff8]
I gathered as much about 5 sentences in. )

It still made my head hurt, though...

Sorry for your heads guys. P

http//www.pakin.org/complaint/

I just had to try it out. I'm lolling at every one of you who acted like I actually took the time to type all of that. lol

I just couldn't standby and watch the utter humiliation. ;)

yes, that was amusing

Hehe, who wants to make a CS ticket with this? I do!! lol

My well thought out 1000th post![/color2159b95872][/size2159b95872]

What do silly doofuses, self-indulgent, abominable dissemblers, and J4320 have in common? If you answered, "They all destroy our culture, our institutions, and our way of life," then pat yourself on the back. To address this in a pedantic manner, in the rest of this letter, factual information will be prefaced as such and my own opinions will be clearly stated as opinions. For instance, it is a fact that J4320 has a talent for inventing fantasy worlds in which it's okay if his screeds initially cause our quality of life to degrade because "sometime", "someone" will do "something" "somehow" to counteract that trend. Then again, just because J4320 is a prolific fantasist doesn't mean that sin is good for the soul. J4320's intellectual dishonesty, mismanagement of facts, and outright lies make doctrinaire, batty traitors seem ready for sainthood, in comparison. And that's why I say to you Have courage. Be honest. And investigate the development of tribalism as a concept. That's the patriotic thing to do, and that's the right thing to do.

^ Hmmm I wonder where you got that paragraph from...

[quote5d8c0938d2="J4320"]Sorry for your heads guys. P

http//www.pakin.org/complaint/

I just had to try it out. I'm lolling at every one of you who acted like I actually took the time to type all of that. lol[/quote5d8c0938d2]

http//forum.freeipodguide.com/smilies_mod/upload/0de66723c22f03beb44f2f1ac59f1b8f.gif[" alt=""/img5d8c0938d2]

plus, freepay makes you wait 30 days after you completed everything to cash out

[quote169e65628b="whitemanjames"]plus, freepay makes you wait 30 days after you completed everything to cash out[/quote169e65628b]
lol

[quote9cddfe9655="J4320"]incomplicitous metanarratives[/quote9cddfe9655]
Please explain this phrase as neither of these letter-formations spell out an actual word. And I do expect a response.

incomplicitous- without complicity.
metanarratives can be broken down into
meta-generally means broad or general
narratives-you should know.

^ Yeah what he said. ;)

[quotecf4867e3d8="J4320"]Freepay has had its say, and this is mine. I begin with critical semantic clarifications. First, it's easy enough to hate Freepay any day of the week on general principles. But now I'll tell you about some very specific things that Freepay is up to, things that ought to make a real Freepay-hater out of you. First off, perhaps one day we will live in a world where good people are not troubled by fear of temperamental bludgers. Until that day arrives, however, we must spread the word that if you think you can escape from Freepay's slovenly ideals, then good-bye and good luck. To the rest of you I suggest that it maintains that those of us who oppose it would rather run than fight. Perhaps it would be best for it to awaken from its delusional narcoleptic fantasyland and observe that it not only lies, but it brags about its lying to its advocates. We must also assert with all the sincerity of informed experience and the desperate desire to see our beloved country survive that I once told Freepay that to help young people develop the ability to make informed and reasoned decisions for the public good as citizens of a culturally diverse, democratic society in an interdependent world, we have to work diligently and effectively to throw down the gauntlet and challenge its fans to enable patriots to use their freedoms to save their freedoms. How did it respond to that? It proceeded to curse me off using a number of colorful expletives not befitting this letter, which serves only to show that no clear-thinking individual would have the temerity to control your bank account, your employment, your personal safety, and your mind. Now, that's a strong conclusion to draw just from the evidence I've presented in this letter. So let me corroborate it by saying that Freepay parrots whatever ideas are fashionable at the moment. When the fashions change, its ideas will change instantly, like a weathercock. Freepay can fool some of the people all of the time. It can fool all of the people some of the time. But it can't fool all of the people all of the time. This is particularly interesting when you consider that those of us who are still sane, those of us who still have a firm grip on reality, those of us who still insist that the drivel emanating freely from Freepay's offices gives me cause to reach for the nearest vomit pail, have an obligation to do more than just observe what Freepay is doing from a safe distance. We have an obligation to invigorate the effort to reach solutions by increasing the scope of the inquiry, rather than by narrowing or abandoning it. We have an obligation to offer a framework for discussion so that we can more quickly reach a consensus. And we have an obligation to establish democracy and equality.

What I have been writing up to this point is not what I initially intended to write in this letter. Instead, I decided it would be far more productive to tell you that Freepay's projects are like a Hydra. They continually acquire new heads and new strength. The only way to stunt their growth is to change the minds of those who concoct labels for people, objects, and behaviors in order to manipulate the public's opinion of them. The only way to destroy its Hydra entirely is to provide more people with the knowledge that Freepay's attendants are unified under a common goal. That goal is to censor any incomplicitous metanarratives. And what of it? I, not being one of the many pesky sensualists of this world, like to face facts. I like to look reality right in the eye and not pretend it's something else. And the reality of our present situation is this One does not have to impair the practice of democracy in order to resolve our disputes without violence. It is an impudent person who believes otherwise. Anyone who has spent much time wading through the pious, obscurantist, jargon-filled cant that now passes for "advanced" thought in the humanities already knows that people who agree with Freepay's inveracities are either stupid, drunk, on drugs, paid off by Freepay, or are self-satisfied boeotians. What may be news, however, is that what I just wrote is not based on merely a single experience or anecdote. Rather, it is based upon the wisdom of accumulated years, spanning two continents, and proven by the fact that if it could have one wish, it'd wish for the ability to sucker us into buying a lot of junk we don't need. Then, people the world over would be too terrified to acknowledge that I do not appreciate being labeled. No one does. Nevertheless, Freepay drops the names of famous people whenever possible. That makes it sound smarter than it really is and obscures the fact that to say that the most valuable skill one can have is to be able to lie convincingly is insensate nonsense and untrue to boot. I don't want this to sound like sour grapes, but I honestly feel that Freepay has insulted everyone with even the slightest moral commitment. It obviously has none, or it wouldn't base racial definitions on lineage, phrenological characteristics, skin hue, and religion.

Freepay attributes the most distorted, bizarre, and ludicrous "meanings" to ordinary personality charcteristics. For example, if you're shy, it calls you "fearful and withdrawn". If, instead, you're the outgoing and active type, Freepay says you're "acting out due to trauma". Why does it say such things? Well, while you're deliberating over that, let me ask you another question Is it hoping that the readers of this letter won't see the weakness of its argument relative to mine? Now, not to bombard you with too many questions, but if I had my druthers, it would never have had the opportunity to expand, augment, and intensify the size and intrusiveness of its camp. As it stands, I want my life to count. I want to be part of something significant and lasting. I want to shine a light on Freepay's efforts to keep us perennially behind the eight ball. Freepay may be sincere, but it is also sincerely obtuse.

The law is not just a moral stance. It is the consensus of society on our minimum standards of behavior. Lest I forget to mention this later, Freepay is too smarmy to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that its loyalists argue that it's merely trying to make this world a better place in which to live. These are the same mudslinging boors who subject us to the possession-obsessed yapping of raucous desperados. This is no coincidence; I can no longer get very excited about any revelation of Freepay's hypocrisy or crookedness. It's what I've come to expect by now. Freepay's adherents employ carefully developed psychological techniques to prosecute, sentence, and label people as truculent clodpolls without the benefit of any evidence whatsoever, and if you don't believe me, then you should recognize and respect the opinions, practices, and behavior of others. If I am correctly informed, Freepay's primary viewpoint, that Man's eternal search for Truth is a challenge to be avoided at all costs, is directly related to the attitudes in our society that cashier anyone who tries to defend with dedication and ferocity the very rights that it so desperately wants to abolish. In any case, I am convinced that there will be a strong effort on Freepay's part to make things worse when you least expect it. This effort will be disguised, of course. It will be cloaked in deceit, as such efforts always are. That's why I'm informing you that Freepay's maudlin preoccupation with sectarianism, usually sicklied over with such nonsense words as "chlamydobacteriaceae", would make sense if a person's honor were determined strictly by his or her ability to sow the seeds of discord. As that's not the case, we can conclude only that if I were a complete sap, I'd believe Freepay's line that it's okay for it to indulge its every whim and lust without regard for anyone else or for society as a whole. Unfortunately for it, I realize that when I was a child, my clergyman told me, "Compassion and moral principle are not the main motives for Freepay's actions." If you think about it you'll see his point. Freepay stands out as the ruler of Planet Aberrent. End of story. Actually, I should add that it is terrified that there might be an absolute reality outside itself, a reality that is what it is, regardless of its wishes, theories, hopes, daydreams, or decrees.

Freepay will simply continue to cause distress to people it doesn't know, has never seen, and who have done it no harm whatsoever. Why do I tell you this? Because these days, no one else has the guts to. There are some basic biological realities of the world in which we live. These realities are doubtless regrettable, but they are unalterable. If Freepay finds them intolerable and unthinkable, the only thing that I can suggest is that it try to flag down a flying saucer and take passage for some other solar system, possibly one in which the residents are oblivious to the fact that "Freepay" has now become part of my vocabulary. Whenever I see someone overthrow the government and eliminate the money system, I tell him or her to stop "Freepay-ing". Anyone who takes even a cursory glance at this letter will quickly discover that knowledge is the key that unlocks the shackles of bondage. That's why it's important for you to know that Freepay seeks scapegoats for its own shortcomings by blaming the easiest target it can find, that is, improvident recidivists. How do you think Freepay will get its hands on all of the incriminating documents about it that I have in my possession? A secretive home or office invasion, a knock on the door, or its favored battering-ram incursion? To rephrase that question, to what degree is Freepay going to break down our communities? It is only when one has an answer to that question is it possible to make sense of its conclusions because in asserting that its animadversions enhance performance standards, productivity, and competitiveness, it demonstrates an astounding narrowness of vision.

In these days of political correctness and the changing of how history is taught in schools to fulfill a particular agenda, if you looked up "unbalanced" in the dictionary, you'd probably see Freepay's logo. Freepay likes to compare its hijinks to those that shaped this nation. The comparison, however, doesn't hold up beyond some uselessly broad, superficial similarities that are so vague and pointless, it's not even worth summarizing them. Didn't Freepay tell its legates that it wants to send self-aggrandizing drongos on safari holidays instead of publicly birching them? Did it first give any thought to what would happen if it did? Of course, that question is ridiculous -- as ridiculous as its grotty imprecations.

I recommend paying close attention to the praxeological method developed by the economist Ludwig von Mises and using it as a technique to carry out this matter to the full extent of the law. The praxeological method is useful in this context because it employs praxeology, the general science of human action, to explain why the main dissensus between me and Freepay is that I aver that it's time for Freepay to get back on the reality bus. It, on the other hand, contends that we can stop racialism merely by permitting government officials entrée into private homes to search for sex-crazed urban guerrillas. Freepay hates you -- yes, you, because you, like me, want to make the world safe for democracy. In order to solve the big problems with Freepay, we must first understand these problems, and to understand them, we must shatter the illusion that it can lead me down a path of pain and suffering and get away with it. Rambunctious clowns are burdened with the preconceived ideas or feeble understanding of the circles to which they previously belonged, both politically and philosophically. That conclusion is not based on some sort of ugly, larcenous philosophy or on Freepay-style mental masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles explain that Freepay doesn't care about freedom, as it can neither sell it nor put it in the bank. It's just a word to it. At the risk of shocking you further, I shall point out that Freepay's lieutenants believe that the sun rises just for Freepay. Although it is perhaps impossible to change the perspective of those who have such beliefs, I wish nevertheless to suggest the kind of politics and policies that are needed to restore good sense to this important debate.

There may be absolutely nothing we can do to prevent Freepay from making good on its word to extract obscene salaries and profits from corporations that use mass organization as a system of integration and control. When we compare this disturbing conclusion to the comforting picture purveyed by its stooges, we experience psychological stress or "cognitive dissonance". Our only recourse is to think outside the box. Let me mention again that Freepay believes that it is a martyr for freedom and a victim of immoralism. That's just wrong. It further believes that it is two-faced to question its plaints. Wrong again!

Freepay's fierce passions and fiendish cunning, combined with abnormal powers of intellect, with intense vitality, and with a persistency of purpose which the world has rarely seen, and whetted moreover by a keen thirst for blood engendered by defeat and subjection, combine to make it the deadly enemy of all mankind, while its infantile, scary announcements contribute to inflame its wild lust of pelf, and to justify the crimes suggested by spite and superstition. Freepay is interpersonally exploitative. That is, it takes advantage of others to achieve its own unambitious ends. Why does it do that? The complete answer to that question is a long, sad story. I've answered parts of that question in several of my previous letters, and I'll answer other parts in future ones. For now, I'll just say that after hearing about its unreasonable attempts to make my blood curdle, I was saddened. I was saddened that it has lowered itself to this level. Consider the issue of apolaustic faddism. Everyone agrees that Freepay has a fondness for spouting out technical mumbo-jumbo, but there are still some materialistic, brutish politicos out there who doubt that Freepay can't see the forest for the trees. To them I say Freepay's ignominious monographs can be quite educational. By studying them, students can observe firsthand the consequences of having an organization consumed with paranoia, fear, hatred, and ignorance.

I have not forgotten that the people Freepay attacks deserve compassion, not insults, put-downs, or stereotypes. I have not forgotten that Freepay's causeries have nothing to do with freedom and honor but everything to do with gnosticism. And I cannot forget that when I was younger, I wanted to encourage opportunity, responsibility, and community. I still want to do that, but now I realize that I should note that it may seem difficult at first to plant markers that define the limits of what is macabre and what is not. It is. But I welcome its comments. However, it needs to realize that we must take up the all-encompassing challenge of freedom, justice, equality, and the pursuit of life with full dignity. Only then can a society free of its gin-swilling, fork-tongued hariolations blossom forth from the roots of the past. And only then will people come to understand that as that last sentence suggests, if the past is any indication of the future, it will once again attempt to engulf the world in a dense miasma of onanism. I would not have thought it possible that anyone who thinks that one can understand the elements of a scientific theory only by reference to the social condition and personal histories of the scientists involved is not living in the real world, but it's true. Some will say I exaggerate, but, actually, I'm being quite lenient. I didn't mention, for example, that Freepay and I disagree about our civic duties. I claim that we must do our utmost to advocate social change through dialogue, passive resistance, and nonviolence as expeditiously as possible. Freepay, on the other hand, believes that if it kicks us in the teeth, we'll then lick its toes and beg for another kick. I think I've dished it out to Freepay as best as I can in this letter. I hope you now understand why I say that I myself truly suspect that Freepay should take more personal responsibility for its actions.[/quotecf4867e3d8]

Amen, brotha. But give the long words a rest, you're not impressing anybody.

PS. I thought it'd be funny to quote his enormous post.

[quote26c04c647d]Freepay has had its say, and this is mine. I begin with critical semantic clarifications.[/quote26c04c647d]

That's how far I got before realizing you didn't write that.